How do harpacticoid grazing rates differ over a tidal cycle? Field verification using chlorophyll-pigment analyses

  • Decho A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Four specles of meiobenthic copepods were examined for dlatom feeding Microscopic analysis of gut-pellet contents from field-collected in&viduals ~n&cated frequent Ingestion of diatoms by 3 harpacticoids (Scottolana canadensis, Microarthndon Ottorale Cletocamptus deitersi) whlle occasional &atom ingestion occurred m Paronychocamptus huntsmani Frustules were usually empty and broken indicahng that contents were d~gested Laboratory expenments using 14C-labehng showed assimilation of diatoms by the 3 species examined Fleld grazing rate s t u b e s were conducted over different portions of a hdal cycle using fluorescent chlorophyll-plgment analysls of gut-contents H ~ g h e s t dlatom consumphon (p < 0 05) occurred just after the mudflat became exposed (i e Early Low Water level, ELW) for S canadensis, while consumptlon at Late Low Water (LLW i e after mudflat is exposed for several hours) was reduced M llttorale showed a somewhat similar pattern in that highest consumptlon rates (p < 0 05) also occurred dunng ELW However, during High Water (HW) and LLW a similar (but reduced) feeding rate was measured P huntsmani appeared to only ingest &atoms (1 e chl-pigments) dunng HW Relationships of feeding processes over a tidal cycle are discussed with regard to distributional patterns in intertidal and subtidal habitats

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Decho, A. (1988). How do harpacticoid grazing rates differ over a tidal cycle? Field verification using chlorophyll-pigment analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 45, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps045263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free