Treatment patterns and outcomes in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy: a US real-world cohort study

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Real-world outcomes are poorly understood for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: Using for the first time a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database, we assessed demographics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low mBC who previously received one line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The post-chemotherapy line was termed the index line of therapy (LOT). Results: 3765 patients [hormone receptor (HR)-positive: 78.8%, HR-negative: 21.0%] met the inclusion criteria (1 January 2011–30 April 2023). 61.7% of HR-positive patients received endocrine therapy prior to the index LOT. The largest patient percentage received single-agent chemotherapy at the index and subsequent two LOTs. For the overall cohort, the median real-world time to treatment discontinuation/death was 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.9–4.2) and the median real-world time to next treatment/death was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.8–5.3) from the index LOT. Median real-world overall survival (all patients) was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval: 15.2–16.5, median follow-up = 54.5 months) from the index LOT. Conclusion: These data highlight the unmet clinical needs of patients with HER2-low mBC by characterizing the treatment patterns and poor outcomes in this population on the current standard of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modi, S., Zhang, S., Byng, D., Hunter, S., Strübing, A., Xiong, Y., … Jacot, W. (2025). Treatment patterns and outcomes in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy: a US real-world cohort study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 211(2), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07649-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free