Female participation and labor market attachment in rural Canada

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article explores the reasons for differences in female rural-urban participation rates by estimating a dynamic model of participation allowing for unobserved heterogeneity and state dependence using Canadian panel data. The results suggest that overall observed differences in rural-urban participation rates are primarily due to differences in observed socioeconomic characteristics. However, for women resident in low-income households, there is evidence that the operation of rural labor markets effectively lowers their participation rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phimister, E., Vera-Toscano, E., & Weersink, A. (2002). Female participation and labor market attachment in rural Canada. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free