Abstract
This article explores the reasons for differences in female rural-urban participation rates by estimating a dynamic model of participation allowing for unobserved heterogeneity and state dependence using Canadian panel data. The results suggest that overall observed differences in rural-urban participation rates are primarily due to differences in observed socioeconomic characteristics. However, for women resident in low-income households, there is evidence that the operation of rural labor markets effectively lowers their participation rates.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Phimister, E., Vera-Toscano, E., & Weersink, A. (2002). Female participation and labor market attachment in rural Canada. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00253
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.