Application of the canadian C-spine rule and nexus low criteria and results of cervical spine radiography in emergency condition

5Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The Canadian C Spine Rule (CCR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (Nexus) low criteria are well accepted as guide to help physician in case of cervical blunt trauma. Methods: We aimed to evaluate retrospectively the application of these recommendations in our emergency department. Secondly we analyzed the quality of cervical spine radiography (CSR) in an emergency setting. Results: 281 patients with cervical blunt trauma were analyzed retrospectively. The CCR and the NEXUS rules were respected in 91.2% and 96.8% of cases respectively. No lesions were found in 96.4% of patient. A lesion was present in 1.1% of patient and suspected in 2.5% of patient. The quality of CSR was adequate in only 37.7% of patient. The poor quality of CSR was due either to the lack of C7 vertebrae visualization in 64.6% or other lower vertebrae in 28%. Other causes included the absence of open mouth view (8%), the absence C1 vertebrae visualization (3.4%), artifact in 2.3% and the absence of lateral view in 0.6% of patient. Conclusion: CCR and NEXUS are widely used in our emergency department. The high rate of inadequate CSR reinforces the debate about it’s utility in emergency condition.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngatchou, W., Beirnaert, J., Lemogoum, D., Bouland, C., Youatou, P., Ramadan, A. S., … Mols, P. (2018). Application of the canadian C-spine rule and nexus low criteria and results of cervical spine radiography in emergency condition. Pan African Medical Journal, 30. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.157.13256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free