Evaluation of HCP5 and Chemokine C receptor type 5 gene polymorphisms in Indian psoriatic patients

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Genetic variations associated with nonprogression of HIV infection to AIDS are enriched in psoriasis patients. HCP5 gene 335 T > G and chemokine C receptor type 5 (CCR5) gene Δ32 polymorphisms are associated with HIV nonprogression phenotype. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the association of HCP5 gene 335 T > G (rs2395029) and CCR5 gene Δ32 (rs333) polymorphisms with psoriasis vulgaris (PV). Materials and Methods: Genotype of HCP5 gene 335 T > G and CCR5 gene Δ32 polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism and allele-specific PCR methods, respectively. Results: The frequency of HCP5 gene 335 T > G SNP was ~7 times higher in PV patients than in the control group (P = 1.49 × 10-8; odds ratio [OR] = 10.2; 0.95 confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-26.8). OR for the occurrence of HCP5 335 G allele in either homozygous or heterozygous genotype in PV patients was 13.1 (0.95 CI: 4.7-36.1). The strength of association was higher with moderate-to-severe subgroup (P = 3.29 × 10-9; OR = 18.4; 0.95 CI: 6.2-54.9) than with mild subgroup (P = 2.1 × 10-4; OR = 8.3; 0.95 CI: 2.6-23.3). In addition, the strength of association was higher with Type I (P = 9.53 × 10-8; OR = 15.3; 0.95 CI: 5.1-46.5) than with Type II subgroup (P = 6.8 × 10-6; OR = 11.0; 0.95 CI: 3.6-33.9). Type I gene Δ32 polymorphism was observed neither among psoriatic nor among healthy individuals. Conclusions: Our results indicate that HCP5 gene 335 T > G polymorphism and not CCR5 gene Δ32 polymorphism is associated with the increased risk of developing PV.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rajesh, D., Nagraj, S., Praveen Kumar, K., Kutty, A., & Balakrishna, S. (2019). Evaluation of HCP5 and Chemokine C receptor type 5 gene polymorphisms in Indian psoriatic patients. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 64(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_285_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free