Anticoagulant vs anti-platelet therapy as prophylactic against cerebral infarction in transient ischemic attacks

79Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

156 patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIA) or rererslble ischemic neurological deficit (RIND) were given prophylactic anticoagulant (AC) treatment against cerebral infarction in a prospective multicenter study from 5 hospitals in southern Sweden. After 2 months of AC treatment, 135 patients remained in the study and were randomized into 2 groups; one continued with AC treatment and one changed to anti-platelet therapy. The patients were followed for 12 months. No significant difference was seen between the 2 groups but 3 completed cerebral infarctions occurred during anti-platelet therapy against one during AC treatment. One cerebral hemorrhage was seen during AC treatment. All completed strokes occurred in men who initially had carotid symptoms. The number of patients with TIA/RIND was somewhat higher in the anti-platelet group whereas myocardial infarctions occurred more often during AC treatment. Compared to the natural history of untreated TIA/RIND both treatments were found to have a prophylactic effect against cerebral infarction. © 1980 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olsson, J. E., Brechter, C., Backlund, H., Krook, H., Mäller, R., Nitelius, E., … Tornberg, A. (1980). Anticoagulant vs anti-platelet therapy as prophylactic against cerebral infarction in transient ischemic attacks. Stroke, 11(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.11.1.4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free