The Safety and Feasibility of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion

18Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospective evidence to support mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for mild ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is lacking. There is uncertainty about using an invasive procedure in patients with mild symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of MT in patients with mild symptoms and LVO. METHODS: Our single-arm prospective pilot study recruited patients with LVO and initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) <6, who underwent standard MT. Primary safety endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and/or worsening NIHSS by ≥4 points. Secondary endpoints included angiographic recanalization, NIHSS change, final infarct volume, and modified Rankin score (mRS). RESULTS: We enrolled 20 patients (mean age 65.6 ± 12.3 yr; 45% females). Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2B/3 thrombectomy was achieved in 95%. No patients suffered sICH. One patient (5%) had neurologic worsening within 24 h because of underlying intracranial stenosis. No other complications or safety concerns were identified. Median NIHSS was significantly better at discharge (0.5, P =. 007) and at last follow-up (0, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toth, G., Ortega-Gutierrez, S., Tsai, J. P., Cerejo, R., Al Kasab, S., Uchino, K., … Samaniego, E. A. (2020). The Safety and Feasibility of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion. Neurosurgery, 86(6), 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free