The clinical significance of "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" as a distinct cytologic category

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The histologic and/or cytologic follow-up of 127 cases of cervical lesions termed "squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade" (SIL) on Papanicolaou (Pap) smears by the 2001 Bethesda System was compared with 150 control cases of low-grade SIL (LSIL), high-grade SIL (HSIL), and atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASCH). A follow-up diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher was identified in 22.8% of SIL cases, which was 2.6 times higher than LSIL, 3 times lower than HSIL, and 1.5 times lower than ASC-H. A follow-up diagnosis of CIN 1 was identified in 31.5% of SIL cases, which was 2 times lower than the LSIL group, 1.5 times higher than the ASC-H cases, and 1.8 times higher than the HSIL group. We found that 22.0% of cases diagnosed as SIL were followed up by Pap smears rather than colposcopy and biopsy, compared with about 1% of LSIL and HSIL cases. Because SIL cases have a significant risk of harboring CIN 2 or greater, we recommend follow-up by colposcopy and biopsy. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, D., Teschendorf, C., Lin, G. Y., & Hasteh, F. (2012). The clinical significance of “squamous intraepithelial lesion of indeterminate grade” as a distinct cytologic category. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 137(5), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPPEJT9D2RGJFH

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free