The association between co-morbidity and mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting in patients ineligible for elective open surgery

33Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: to investigate whether co-morbidity affects mortality after endovascular stenting in patients who are fit and unfit for open surgery. Methods: data were obtained from the EUROSTAR registry. The association between co-morbidity and mortality was examined by Cox proportional hazards models. Results: between 1994 and July 2000, 2862 patients underwent aneurysm stenting; 381 were unfit for open surgery. The early/late mortality rates for patients fit for surgery, patients unfit for surgery and patients unfit for anaesthesia were 2.7/5.2%, 5.1/11.4% (p=0.035/p<0.0001) and 3.7/11.0% (NS/p=0.016), respectively. The survival curves among patients with poor medical condition were significantly worse than in those patients with a good medical condition (p=0.001). The presence or absence of co-existing diseases did not affect the mortality rate in patients unfit for open surgery. The age-adjusted mortality risks of patients fit for open surgery and pulmonary disease or diabetes mellitus were 1.41 (1.02-1.95) and 1.75 (1.12-2.74), respectively. Conclusions: patients with co-morbidity had a significantly higher mortality after aortic endografting compared with patients fit for open surgery. Co-morbidity did not increase mortality after endovascular abdominal repair in patients unfit for open surgery. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm seems to have a limited benefit in patients unfit for open surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Riambau, V., Laheij, R. J. F., García-Madrid, C., & Sánchez-Espin, G. (2001). The association between co-morbidity and mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting in patients ineligible for elective open surgery. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 22(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free