Validation of three weight gain‑based algorithms as a screening tool to detect retinopathy of prematurity: A multicenter study

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Screening guidelines for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are updated frequently to help clinicians identify infants at risk of type 1 ROP. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of three different predictive algorithms—WINROP, ROPScore, and CO‑ROP—in detecting ROP in preterm infants in a developing country. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 386 preterm infants from two centers between 2015 and 2021. Neonates with gestational age ≤30 weeks and/or birth weight ≤1500 g who underwent ROP screening were included. Results: One hundred twenty‑three neonates (31.9%) developed ROP. The sensitivity to identify type 1 ROP was as follows: WINROP, 100%; ROPScore, 100%; and CO‑ROP, 92.3%. The specificity was 28% for WINROP, 1.4% for ROPScore, and 19.3% for CO‑ROP. CO‑ROP missed two neonates with type 1 ROP. WINROP provided the best performance for type 1 ROP with an area under the curve score at 0.61. Conclusion: The sensitivity was at 100% for WINROP and ROPScore for type 1 ROP; however, specificity was quite low for both algorithms. Highly specific algorithms tailored to our population may serve as a useful adjunctive tool to detect preterm infants at risk of sight‑threatening ROP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raffa, L., Alamri, A., Alosaimi, A., Alessa, S., Alharbi, S., Ahmedhussain, H., … AlQurashi, M. (2023). Validation of three weight gain‑based algorithms as a screening tool to detect retinopathy of prematurity: A multicenter study. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(6), 2555–2560. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2013_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free