Using ecological data as a foundation for decision-making in the USA

0Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Decisions that impact the quality of aquatic systems are being made daily throughout the world based on little or no ecological information (Barbour et al., 2004). Monitoring information, based on scientifically and rigorously tested ecological indicators, is integral to water quality management programs for protecting human health, preserving and restoring ecosystem integrity, and sustaining a viable economy. Under the Clean Water Act of the United States, water quality agencies of the states and tribes are required to conduct monitoring and assessment to address the mandates of the law. However, recent critiques of water monitoring programs have claimed that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and State water quality agencies cannot make statistically valid inferences about water quality and the condition of the Nation's waters, i.e., whether they are improving, degrading or remaining the same; furthermore, we lack data to support management decisions regarding the Nation's aquatic resources. The National Wadeable Streams Assessment Program (WSA) was established in early 2004 to answer the question of what is the status of the Nation's waters, and to maximize partnerships among U.S. EPA, States and Tribes, and other agencies to establish a framework to address issues at state and local scales. Ecological data in any form require some measure of translation to be useable by the environmental manager, i.e., a hierarchy exists in the translation process from basic biological data in its rawest form through a series of manipulations in the analysis phase to reporting of the results and interpretation. This nationally focused program is a step towards ensuring adequate monitoring data exist in the future to assess water quality and make sound watershed management decisions throughout the USA; actions are taken to protect and restore water quality that maximize benefits and minimize costs; and sound science forms the basis of making informed decisions regarding our aquatic resource. © Asociación Española de Limnología.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barbour, M. T., Holdsworth, S., & Paulsen, S. (2006). Using ecological data as a foundation for decision-making in the USA. Limnetica, 25(3), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.25.40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free