Encouraging the outcomes of children with beta-thalassaemia major who underwent fresh cord blood transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is currently the only curative treatment for thalassaemia major (TM). Cord blood (CB) from a sibling has different characteristics from marrow and has potential advantages and disadvantages as a stem cell source. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 children with beta-thalassaemia major (β-TM) who underwent fresh cord blood transplantation (F-CBT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) between June 2010 and July 2018 in the Department of Pediatrics, Nanfang Hospital and Haematology-Oncology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital. Results: The median infused doses of total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34 + cells were 8.51×107/kg and 3.16×105/kg, respectively. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were, respectively, 27 and 31 days. The cumulative probabilities of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were very low after F-CBT (7.8% and 0.0%, respectively). Of the 68 paediatric patients, 67 patients survived during a median follow-up period of 61 months. The estimated 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 98.5% and 87.9%, respectively. Three patients experienced graft rejection (GR) (4.5%), and we identified CD34 + cell dose as a significant risk factor for graft failure (p = 0.036) in stratify analysis. Conclusions: The above results indicate that patients with β-TM have excellent outcomes after F-CBT from an HLA-MSD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wen, J., Wang, X., Chen, L., He, Y., Feng, X., Li, C., … Wu, X. (2022). Encouraging the outcomes of children with beta-thalassaemia major who underwent fresh cord blood transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor. Hematology (United Kingdom), 27(1), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2022.2038402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free