A multi-objective approach towards urban drainage development prioritization and project definition structure

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In developing countries, policy-makers at all levels are confronted with the problem of prioritizing different projects which needs to be done in a systematic method for the optimal allocation of funds. The current study is focused in addressing the above-mentioned problem for urban storm water drainage networks, and it aims to address two key questions: 'Which drainage projects should be tackled first?' and 'Does the project definition structure influence the prioritized projects?' The northeastern part of Tehran is selected as the case study and the first question is addressed through a prioritization method based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Three different criteria including investment costs, flood damage costs, and exposure costs are considered. It is concluded that the multi-objective approach can better handle the problem in hand. To deal with the second question, two levels of project definition are investigated. The results reveal that the project definition structure has a clear impact on the objectives and its enhancement can lead to better system performance in terms of objective functions. This finding implies that despite the current trend in the city of Tehran, project definition structure should receive appropriate attention before the results are evaluated in a subsequent prioritizing framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rad, I. Z., & Ardeshir, A. (2015). A multi-objective approach towards urban drainage development prioritization and project definition structure. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 17(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2015.134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free