Empirical Modeling of the Plasmasphere Dynamics Using Neural Networks

63Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present the PINE (Plasma density in the Inner magnetosphere Neural network-based Empirical) model - a new empirical model for reconstructing the global dynamics of the cold plasma density distribution based only on solar wind data and geomagnetic indices. Utilizing the density database obtained using the NURD (Neural-network-based Upper hybrid Resonance Determination) algorithm for the period of 1 October 2012 to 1 July 2016, in conjunction with solar wind data and geomagnetic indices, we develop a neural network model that is capable of globally reconstructing the dynamics of the cold plasma density distribution for 2≤L≤6 and all local times. We validate and test the model by measuring its performance on independent data sets withheld from the training set and by comparing the model-predicted global evolution with global images of He+ distribution in the Earth's plasmasphere from the IMAGE Extreme UltraViolet (EUV) instrument. We identify the parameters that best quantify the plasmasphere dynamics by training and comparing multiple neural networks with different combinations of input parameters (geomagnetic indices, solar wind data, and different durations of their time history). The optimal model is based on the 96 h time history of Kp, AE, SYM-H, and F10.7 indices. The model successfully reproduces erosion of the plasmasphere on the nightside and plume formation and evolution. We demonstrate results of both local and global plasma density reconstruction. This study illustrates how global dynamics can be reconstructed from local in situ observations by using machine learning techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhelavskaya, I. S., Shprits, Y. Y., & Spasojević, M. (2017). Empirical Modeling of the Plasmasphere Dynamics Using Neural Networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 122(11), 11,227-11,244. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free