Highlighting the role of the model user and physical interpretation in urban flooding simulation

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Technological evolution survey allowed the broad use of 2D mathematical models for flood simulation. However, it is possible that the answer required for a given problem does not need a 2D approximation or even does not configure a 2D surface solution. Urban flood simulations may fall in this second case, since urban structures may interact with flood flows and introduce discontinuities in the surface solution. This study aims to highlight the discussion about the physical interpretation and the modeller role as key elements in the interpretation and representation of physical systems. To support this proposal, the MODCEL, a Quasi-2D flow-cell model, was used in two different ways: in a detailed raster approach, similarly to usual 2D model uses; and in an alternative conceptual and interpretive way, using larger cells representing homogeneous portions of the territory. The modelling results showed that equivalent responses can be obtained. Although other models can be used and could offer different absolute results, the relative analysis offered sufficient support to the research hypothesis that a physical-based process conducted by a conscient modeller is crucial for model reliability and optimization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Sousa, M. M., de Oliveira, A. K. B., Rezende, O. M., de Magalhães, P. M. C., Pitzer Jacob, A. C., de Magalhães, P. C., & Miguez, M. G. (2022). Highlighting the role of the model user and physical interpretation in urban flooding simulation. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 24(5), 976–991. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2022.174

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free