Ultimate Attribution in the Genetic Era: White Support for Genetic Explanations of Racial Difference and Policies

40Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study uses a nationally representative survey to examine the relationship between attitudes about genetics and race. We focus on the ways in which negative out-group behavior can be explained as innate and genetic (Pettigrew’s “ultimate attribution error”), and how this may underlie racial prejudice and racial individualism—the notion that individual capabilities, not structural inequality or discrimination, drive racial stratification. We examine the relationship between attitudes about genetics and racially ameliorative policies. We find whites are more accepting of genetic explanations for blacks’ traits and behaviors. Our analyses show that racialized genetic attribution, among other factors, increases opposition to racial policies. When linked with racial individualism, though, genetic attribution can actually reduce opposition to racial policies—a finding that paints a disconcerting picture of how biological determinism is embedded in white racial ideology. Findings are discussed in relation to efforts to reduce racial inequality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Byrd, W. C., & Ray, V. E. (2015). Ultimate Attribution in the Genetic Era: White Support for Genetic Explanations of Racial Difference and Policies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 661(1), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215587887

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free