Narrative Review of Electronic Health Record Systems in Anesthesia: Benefits, Risks, and Medico-Legal Considerations in the United States of America

2Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have transformed healthcare delivery and documentation by accurately capturing routine care and critical events through automated data recording. EHRs also enable clinical decision support, quality improvement initiatives, and large-scale research. A narrative review has been constructed using relevant research regarding medicolegal liability associated with EHRs, related to anesthesia care. EHRs have created new liability exposures through alert fatigue, system errors, and inappropriate use of functions such as copy-and-paste. Ethical issues and concerns with EHRs include privacy, informed consent, and secondary data uses. Metadata, “data about the data”, provides insight into record authenticity, clinician involvement in care, and communication between providers. However, EHR metadata is legally discoverable, and courts have compelled its release to plaintiffs despite hospital objections. This narrative review covers the benefits of EHRs in anesthesiology practice, discusses medicolegal liability and ethical concerns, and highlights a method for assessing medicolegal risks using the EHR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tewfik, G., Minzter, B., Chiao, F., Zivot, J., Wecksell, M., Simpao, A. F., … O’Reilly-Shah, V. (2025, December 1). Narrative Review of Electronic Health Record Systems in Anesthesia: Benefits, Risks, and Medico-Legal Considerations in the United States of America. Journal of Medical Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02221-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free