Does thigh compression improve venous hemodynamics in chronic venous insufficiency?

79Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of thigh compression in patients with deep venous incompetence. Patients and methods: This diagnostic test study was set in a municipal general hospital. Twelve patients with venous leg ulcers (CEAP classification, C6 Es Ad Pr; four men and eight women), with a mean age of 56.5 ± 16.8 years, with popliteal venous reflux of more than 1 second detected with duplex scan, underwent investigation with the following methods: 1, the pressure exerted under thigh-length compression stockings class II and short-stretch adhesive compression bandages was measured with an MST tester (Salzmann, Switzerland) and a CCS 1000 device (Juzo, Germany), respectively; 2, the great saphenous vein and the femoral vein on the thigh were compressed with a pneumatic cuff (0, 20, 40, and 60 mm Hg) containing a window through which the diameters of these veins could be measured with duplex ultrasonography; and 3, with the same thigh-cuff occlusion procedure, the venous filling index (VFI) for each experiment was measured with air plethysmography. These values reflected the presence and extent of venous reflux in each experiment depending on the degree of venous narrowing. Results: The mean pressure of a class II compression stocking was about 15 mm Hg at the thigh level, and adhesive bandages achieved a pressure of more than 40 mm Hg in the same location. A statistically significant reduction of the diameters of the great saphenous vein and the femoral vein could be obtained only when the cuff pressure on the thigh was equal to or higher than 40 mm Hg (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Partsch, H., Menzinger, G., Borst-Krafek, B., & Groiss, E. (2002). Does thigh compression improve venous hemodynamics in chronic venous insufficiency? Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36(5), 948–952. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.127343

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free