Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric, radiobiological, and toxicity differences between different cylinder diameters (d) in high-dose-rate three-dimensional computed-tomography-guided vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: From January 2019 to January 2024, postoperative EC patients treated with exclusive VBT using cylinders were classified by the cylinder diameter (d ≤ 2.6 cm: small-size; d ≥ 3.0 cm: large-size) and matched according to 1:2 propensity score matching. Vaginal clinical target volume (CTV) was a 3-mm expansion around the cylinder surface. Dosimetric parameters in equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) (α/β = 3 Gy) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of vaginal_CTV and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Urinary, gastrointestinal, and vaginal toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v5.0. Results: After matching, 132 patients (small-size: 44; large-size: 88) were analyzed. For vaginal_CTV, the small-size group had higher doses to 2%, 5%, 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc of the volume (D2, D5, D0.1 cc, D1cc, and D2cc) than the large-size group while lower doses to the 95%, 98%, and 100% volume (D95, D98, and D100). The D2cc and D5cc of bladder and all dosimetric parameters of rectum were smaller in the small-size group. The EUD of vaginal_CTV, bladder, and rectum showed no significant differences. No significant differences in toxicities were found within the median follow-up of 26.8 months. Conclusion: Cylinders with smaller diameters produced more nonuniform dose distributions in the target and delivered lower doses to bladder and rectum than large-size cylinders. However, the dosimetric differences did not translate into significant differences of radiobiological parameters or outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, K., Jiang, P., & Wang, J. (2024). Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 150(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05994-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free