Effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump therapy during five years of treatment on metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus

14Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with multiple daily insulin (MDI) therapy on metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) over the long term. Methods: Fifty-two T1DM patients treated with CSII and monitored for at least one year prior to and at least five years following CSII were included. Thirty-eight age and sex-matched MDI controls with a 5-year follow up were recruited. Results: Mean age of the subjects, duration of diabetes and CSII therapy were 17.0±4.8 years, 10.7±2.8 years and 7.7±1.5 years respectively. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the year prior to CSII, during the first year of treatment and after 5 years of CSII were 7.3±1% (56 mmol/mol), 7.0±0.7% (53 mmol/mol) and 7.8±1.3% (62 mmol/mol) respectively. Initial and 5-year mean HbA1C levels of controls were 7.9±1.08% and 8.6±1.8%. Mean HbA1c values were significantly lower in those receiving CSII therapy throughout follow-up. Basal and total insulin doses were significantly lower in the CSII group at all times. HbA1c was compared between subjects by age (0-5, 6-11 and 12-18 years) with no significant difference between them. Conclusion: Although CSII mean HbA1c values exceeded accepted good metabolic control limits after 5 years, CSII produces better HbA1c control at all times and in all age groups compared to MDI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korkmaz, Ö., Demir, G., Çetin, H., Mecidov, İ., Altınok, Y. A., Özen, S., … Gökşen, D. (2018). Effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump therapy during five years of treatment on metabolic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. JCRPE Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, 10(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.5117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free