Examining older adults’ perceptions of usability and acceptability of remote monitoring systems to manage chronic heart failure

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of using remote monitoring systems (RMS) in monitoring health status (e.g., vital signs, symptom distress) in older adults (≥55) with chronic heart failure (HF). Method: Twenty-one patients (52.4% women, mean age 73.1 ± 9.3) were trained to measure and transmit health data with an RMS. Data transmissions were tracked for 12 weeks. Results: All participants initiated use of RMS within 1 week; 71%, 14%, and 14% of patients transmitted daily health data 100%, ≥75%, and <75% of the time, respectively, for 12 weeks. Overall usability and acceptability of the RMS were 4.08 ± 0.634 and 4.10 ± 0.563, respectively (when scored on a range of 1-5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). Discussion: Findings show that an RMS-based intervention can be successfully implemented in a group of older patients with chronic HF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evangelista, L. S., Moser, D. K., Lee, J. A., Moore, A. A., Ghasemzadeh, H., Sarrafzadeh, M., & Mangione, C. M. (2015). Examining older adults’ perceptions of usability and acceptability of remote monitoring systems to manage chronic heart failure. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721415618050

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free