Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law

1Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This manuscript critically discusses the current implications of the scriptural injunctions against gharar and maysir. It elaborates how overlooking the features of the contemporary world and adopting a formalistic approach in Islamic jurisprudence have led to absurdity in the implication of the doctrines of gharar and maysir for Muslims’ financial activities. The manuscript also underscores the necessity of adopting the maqāsid approach (purposivism) in Islamic jurisprudence. It propounds that the cogent concern of the injunctions could have been an initiative for Islamic scholars to establish an advanced contract law and to promote transparency in economic activities if a maqāsid approach had been adopted in Islamic jurisprudence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abedifar, P. (2023). Formalism versus Purposivism in Islamic Jurisprudence: The Case of Islamic Finance Law. Religions, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free