Abstract
Intervening in the Australian vaccination debate, I found that STS perspectives helped me understand the controversy but gave little guidance on how to defend against attacks. Max Liboiron comments that preparation, including support networks, should precede interventions. I was well supported in my involvement in the vaccination debate, but those who openly advocate a stigmatized view may have difficulty gaining support. Teun Zuiderent-Jerak asks what is being learned when interventions reinforce existing categories. Controversy participants can learn by being exposed to STS perspectives; controversy researchers, when attacked, can gain new information and develop new research ideas.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Martin, B. (2016). STS Interventions: Preparing, Defending, Learning. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2016.93
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.