Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the etiology of epiphora in a tertiary Australian lacrimal clinic and highlight the high proportion of ‘functional’ cases. Methods: Single-center retrospective review: Records of adult patients presenting to a tertiary lacrimal clinic from January 2011 to February 2021 with epiphora were reviewed. Patients underwent testing with syringing/probing and lacrimal imaging to reach a diagnosis of functional epiphora. Functional epiphora was diagnosed based on the exclusion of alternate causes of epiphora on clinical examination, patent lacrimal syringing, normal dacryocystography, and delay on dacryoscintigraphy. Results: Five hundred and seventy-six symptomatic eyes of 372 adult patients (mean 66.2 ± 15.5 years, 63.4% females) with epiphora were evaluated for causes. Post-sac obstruction (stenosis/complete obstruction) and functional epiphora (non-anatomical delay) were the most common causes of presentations to the lacrimal clinic (26% each). Functional epiphora with post-sac delay was substantially more common than functional epiphora with pre-sac delay (89% vs. 11% of functional epiphora cases). In 16% of the cases, no cause for the epiphora was found while more than one cause (multifactorial) was present 11% of the time. Conclusion: Functional epiphora was found to be as common as a nasolacrimal anatomical obstruction when lacrimal imaging is utilized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Usmani, E., Shapira, Y., & Selva, D. (2023). Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity. International Ophthalmology, 43(8), 2687–2693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02668-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free