Abstract
Background. Observational outcome studies of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) require adjustment for co-morbidity to produce valid results. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of administrative data and self-reported data provided a more complete estimate of co-morbidity among patients referred for sleep diagnostic testing. Methods. A retrospective observational study of 2149 patients referred for sleep diagnostic testing in Calgary, Canada. Self-reported co-morbidity was obtained with a questionnaire; administrative data and validated algorithms (when available) were also used to define the presence of these co-morbid conditions within a two-year period prior to sleep testing. Results. Patient self-report of co-morbid conditions had varying levels of agreement with those derived from administrative data, ranging from substantial agreement for diabetes (κ = 0.79) to poor agreement for cardiac arrhythmia (κ = 0.14). The enhanced measure of co-morbidity using either self-report or administrative data had face validity, and provided clinically meaningful trends in the prevalence of co-morbidity among this population. Conclusion. An enhanced measure of co-morbidity using self-report and administrative data can provide a more complete measure of the co-morbidity among patients with OSA when agreement between the two sources is poor. This methodology will aid in the adjustment of these coexisting conditions in observational studies in this area. © 2009 Ronksley et al.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ronksley, P. E., Tsai, W. H., Quan, H., Faris, P., & Hemmelgarn, B. R. (2009). Data enhancement for co-morbidity measurement among patients referred for sleep diagnostic testing: An observational study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-50
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.