Comparative effectiveness of two popular weight loss programs in women III: health and fitness markers

  • Oliver J
  • Mardock M
  • Lockard B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

42 sedentary women (33+/-7 yrs, 164+/-7 cm; 93+/-19 kg; 46+/-7% body fat, 35+/-6 kg/m2) were randomized to participate in the Curves (C) or Weight Watchers (W) programs for 16-wks. Participants in the C program followed a 1,200 kcal/d diet for 1-wk and 1,500 kcal/d diet for 3 wks (30:45 CHO:PRO). Subjects then ingested 2,000 kcals/d for 2-wks (45:30) and repeated this diet while participating in the Curves with Zumba program 3-d-wk. Remaining subjects followed the W point-based diet program. Data were obtained at 0, 4, 10, & 16 wks while fitness was assessed at 0 and 16 wks. Data were analyzed by MANOVA. Both programs decreased BMI (-6.5+/-4%, p=0.001), waist circumference (-6.2+/-5%, p=0.001), hip circumference (-5.7+/-4%, p=0.001), resting HR (-4.2+/-13%, qp=0.04), resting SBP (-3.2+/-8%, p=0.06), and increased peak aerobic capacity (10.9+/-9%, p=0.001). Waist circumference tended to decrease at a faster rate in the C group (qp=0.08) and changes in resting HR were generally improved to a greater degree in the C group. Bench press 1RM (C 4.9+/-13, W -1.1+/-11%, p=0.11), leg press 1RM (C 5.8+/-15, W 1.4+/-20%, p=0.44), bench press endurance (C 59+/-100, W 2.7+/-49%, p=0.02), leg press endurance (C 12.3+/-93, W 1.8+/-57%, p=0.66), and peak aerobic capacity (C 12.5+/-9, W 9.6+/-9%, p=0.31) were generally higher in the C group. Results indicate that participation in the C program improved some markers of health & fitness to a greater degree than the W program.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliver, J., Mardock, M., Lockard, B., Byrd, M., Simbo, S., Jagim, A., … Kreider, R. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of two popular weight loss programs in women III: health and fitness markers. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 8(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-8-s1-p5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free