The fallacy of the natural rate of interest and zero lower bound economics: Why negative interest rates may not remedy Keynesian unemployment

34Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper provides a critique of zero lower bound (ZLB) economics which has become the new orthodoxy for explaining stagnation. ZLB economics is an extension of pre-Keynesian economics which attributes macroeconomic dysfunction to rigidities and market imperfections. The ZLB is the latest rigidity in that pre-Keynesian tradition. The paper argues negative nominal interest rates, even if feasible, may be unable to remedy Keynesian demand shortage unemployment, and might even aggravate the problem. That is because there exist non-reproduced assets whose return dominates that of investment, and savingmay also increase in response to negative rates. Consequently, there may be no natural rate of interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palley, T. I. (2019). The fallacy of the natural rate of interest and zero lower bound economics: Why negative interest rates may not remedy Keynesian unemployment. Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2019.02.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free