Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001

263Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics; of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, S. D., Verweij, J., Rowinsky, E. K., Donehower, R. C., Schellens, J. H. M., Grochow, L. B., & Sparreboom, A. (2002, December 18). Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.24.1883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free