Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

50Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The advent of ChatGPT by OpenAI has prompted extensive discourse on its potential implications for science and higher education. While the impact on education has been a primary focus, there is limited empirical research on the effects of large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based chatbots on science and scientific practice. To investigate this further, we conducted a Delphi study involving 72 researchers specializing in AI and digitization. The study focused on applications and limitations of LLMs, their effects on the science system, ethical and legal considerations, and the required competencies for their effective use. Our findings highlight the transformative potential of LLMs in science, particularly in administrative, creative, and analytical tasks. However, risks related to bias, misinformation, and quality assurance need to be addressed through proactive regulation and science education. This research contributes to informed discussions on the impact of generative AI in science and helps identify areas for future action.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fecher, B., Hebing, M., Laufer, M., Pohle, J., & Sofsky, F. (2025). Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system. AI and Society, 40(2), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01791-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free