The diagnosis of acute, recurrent, deep-vein thrombosis: A diagnostic challenge

153Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recurrent venous thrombosis presents a diagnostic challenge. Venography, impedance plethysmography and fibrinogen leg scanning all have potential limitations, and their role in this context has not been evaluated. We performed a prospective cohort study evaluating impedance plethysmography and leg scanning, plus venography, using outcome on long-term follow-up as the end point in 270 patients with clinically suspected recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. Anticoagulant treatment was withheld in the 181 patients negative by noninvasive testing and was given in patients positive by impedance plethysmography if leg scanning was positive or if intraluminal filling defects were detected by venography. The validity of this approach was tested by long-term follow-up. Three of 181 patients (1.7%) negative by noninvasive testing had a recurrence, compared with 18 of 89 (20%) with positive findings (p<0.001). Our objective diagnostic approach has high clinical utility; an objective rationale for withholding or giving treatment was established in 95% of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hull, R. D., Carter, C. J., Jay, R. M., Ockelford, P. A., Hirsch, J., Turpie, A. G., … Powers, P. J. (1983). The diagnosis of acute, recurrent, deep-vein thrombosis: A diagnostic challenge. Circulation, 67(4), 901–906. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.67.4.901

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free