Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry

22Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although national guidelines do not recommend extent of disease imaging for patients with newly diagnosed early stage breast cancer given that the harm outweighs the benefits, high rates of testing have been documented. The 2012 Choosing Wisely guidelines specifically addressed this issue. We examined the change over time in imaging use across a statewide collaborative, as well as the reasons for performing imaging and the impact on cost of care. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data and use of advanced imaging tests (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and bone scan) were abstracted from the medical records of patients treated at 25 participating sites in the Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative (MiBOQI). For patients diagnosed in 2014 and 2015, reasons for testing were abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: Of the 34,078 patients diagnosed with stage 0-II breast cancer between 2008 and 2015 in MiBOQI, 6853 (20.1%) underwent testing with at least 1 imaging modality in the 90 days after diagnosis. There was considerable variability in rates of testing across the 25 sites for all stages of disease. Between 2008 and 2015, testing decreased over time for patients with stage 0-IIA disease (all P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henry, N. L., Braun, T. M., Breslin, T. M., Gorski, D. H., Silver, S. M., & Griggs, J. J. (2017). Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry. Cancer, 123(15), 2975–2983. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free