Radon indoors source potential from soil gas in a temperate climate: impact of infiltration rate and seismicity

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Indoor radon source potential from unground soil was monitored using prototype devices approaching a dwelling with a cellar basement at 1 depth from the soil-atmosphere interface. Therefore, the radon concentrations in soil gas were monitored at 1 m depth. Integrated radon measurements were performed, and the results correlated with meteorological parameters. The influence of the difference in outdoor and device-soil temperature was considered, and the infiltration rate was calculated. The effect of the soil temperature gradient on the soil radon entry rate was evaluated. The indoor radon entry rate due to the soil gas was 7.0 ± 2.7 Bq m−3 h−1. The radon entry rate was 5.0 ± 0.8 Bq m−3 h−1 due to diffusion. In contrast, the advection-drive flow of soil gas is ranged up to ± 4.0 Bq m−3 h−1. So, the infiltration rate of the model dwelling was 0.7 (± 0.5) × 10−1 h−1 if only the stack effect occurred. The radon levels in tap water were measured, and the radon entry rate was estimated at 1.3 ± 0.7 Bq m−3 h−1. If the ventilation rate is low or seismic faulting appears, the soil radon entry is increased by one order of magnitude. The soil radon appeared like the building materials, having 1/3 of the total indoor radon entry, while outdoor air was slightly lower (28%), with tap water at 5%. The resident’s mortality risk occurred at < 2.5% for typical dwellings in temperate climate areas founded on sand-gravel underground. The risk rises to 34% with an extremely low ventilation rate between indoors and outdoors or high radon entry from the soil due to seismic faulting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoulos, S. (2024). Radon indoors source potential from soil gas in a temperate climate: impact of infiltration rate and seismicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(13), 20277–20292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32334-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free