Abstract
Much has been written on whether practical knowledge (knowledge-how) reduces to propositional knowledge (knowledge-that). Less attention has been paid to what we call deliberative knowledge (knowledge-to), i.e., knowledge ascriptions embedding other infinitival questions, like where to meet, when to leave, and what to bring. We offer an analysis of knowledge-to and argue on its basis that, regardless of whether knowledge-how reduces to knowledge-that, no such reduction of knowledge-to is forthcoming. Knowledge-to, unlike knowledge-that and knowledge-how, requires the agent to have formed certain conditional intentions. We discuss the philosophical implications for knowledge-how, deliberative questions, and virtue.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jerzak, E., & Kocurek, A. W. (2025). Knowing what to do. Nous, 59(1), 160–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12503
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.