Which matters most to the estimation of efficiency and productivity growth in state manufacturing: Method or measurement?

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The measurement of efficiency and productivity growth at the regional level requires the researcher to select among several choices for capital estimation and methodology. We look at two capital estimation techniques, by Munnell and by Garofalo and Yamarik, and two methodologies, data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier estimation. The measurement of efficiency does not appear to be very sensitive to the choice of capital or technique. However, the measurement of productivity is sensitive to the choice of an estimation technique for a given measure of capital.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Primont, D. F., & Domazlicky, B. R. (2005). Which matters most to the estimation of efficiency and productivity growth in state manufacturing: Method or measurement? Review of Regional Studies, 35(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free