Relationship between prognostic stage in breast cancer and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Abstract

This retrospective study examined the relationship between the standardized uptake value max (SUVmax) of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT) and the prognostic stage of breast cancer. We examined 358 breast cancers in 334 patients who underwent18 F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging between January 2016 and December 2019. We extracted data including SUVmax of18 F-FDG PET and pathological biomark-ers, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and nuclear grade. Anatomical and prognostic stages were determined per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition). We examined whether there were statistical differences in SUVmax between each prognostic stage. The mean SUVmax values for clinical prognostic stages were as follow: stage 0, 2.2 ± 1.4; stage IA, 2.6 ± 2.1; stage IB, 4.2 ± 3.5; stage IIA, 5.2 ± 2.8; stage IIB, 7.7 ± 6.7; and stage III + IV, 7.0 ± 4.5. The SUVmax values for pathological prognostic stages were as follows: stage 0, 2.2 ± 1.4; stage IA, 2.8 ± 2.2; stage IB, 5.4 ± 3.6; stage IIA, 6.3 ± 3.1; stage IIB, 9.2 ± 7.5, and stage III + IV, 6.2 ± 5.2. There were significant differences in mean SUVmax between clinical prognostic stage 0 and ≥II (p < 0.001) and I and ≥II (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in mean SUVmax between pathological prognostic stage 0 and ≥II (p < 0.001) and I and ≥II (p < 0.001). In conclusion, mean SUVmax increased with all stages up to prognostic stage IIB, and there were significant differences between several stages. The SUVmax of18 F-FDG PET/CT may contribute to prognostic stage stratification, particularly in early cases of breast cancers.