A framework for identifying the adaptations responsible for differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults

27Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Time to complete two tests of manual dexterity, the 9-hole Peg Test and Grooved Pegboard Test, increases with advancing age. However, the adaptations responsible for the differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults are largely unknown. Potential mechanisms include neuromuscular characteristics, cognitive function, and cutaneous sensation. To provide a tractable framework to address these gaps in knowledge, the purpose of the current study was to identify the latent variables underlying age-associated differences in time to complete the 9-hole and grooved pegboard tests. The approach involved an independent component analysis that identified associations between the two pegboard times for the two groups of participants with two to six secondary outcomes. The common association across three of the four conditions (two groups and two pegboard tests) was features derived from force-matching tasks requiring submaximal isometric contraction. In addition, there were significant associations for older adults between age, measures of cognitive function, and pegboard times. Nonetheless, the significant associations were unique for each age group and pegboard test. The results provide a framework for subsequent mechanistic studies to identify the adaptations underlying age-associated declines in manual dexterity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamilton, L. D., Thomas, E., Almuklass, A. M., & Enoka, R. M. (2017). A framework for identifying the adaptations responsible for differences in pegboard times between middle-aged and older adults. Experimental Gerontology, 97, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.07.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free