Mathematics teachers’ professional development: A systematic review of training methods

2Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a systematic review of the Web of Science and Scopus in order to identify the training methods that have been used in promoting the professional development of early childhood and primary school teachers to teach mathematics. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses method, 58 papers have been identified. Six training methods have been identified: reflection on teaching practice (41.4%), creating learning environments (27.6%), content instruction (15.5%), lesson study (10.4%) and, finally, inquiry-based learning (3.4%) and flipped classroom (1.7%). We also confirmed that different training methods focus on different variables and factors such as knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, motivation, creativity, teaching vision, noticing or others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alsina, Á., Pincheira, N., & Franco, J. (2025). Mathematics teachers’ professional development: A systematic review of training methods. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free