Atrophic rhinitis vaccine composition triggers different serological profiles that do not correlate with protection

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Atrophic rhinitis (AR) is a widespread and economically important disease of swine caused by Bordetella bronchiseptica and Pasteurella multocida. It can be controlled by vaccination. This study investigates the effect of altering the composition (adjuvants and/or addition of formalin-inactivated P. multocida toxin, fPMT) of conventional vaccines on the serological profile and on protection against AR in swine. A significantly higher B. bronchiseptica specific antibody titre was detected for vaccines with novel immunostimulants, the best being Montanide IMS 1313 (1:630 compared to 1:274 obtained with alum). The highest B. bronchiseptica antibody titre was demonstrated for a combination of B. bronchiseptica - fPMT, while PMT antibody titre was highest for monovalent fPMT (both adjuvanted with IMS 1313). The AR-specific antibodies were transmitted from dams to their offspring in similar titres and with the same hierarchy of effectiveness. After a B. bronchiseptica - P, multocida bacterial challenge, piglets from dams vaccinated with fPMT combined with B, bronchiseptica or B. bronchiseptica - P. multocida bacterins showed the lowest nasal lesions scores (4.5 and 3.2, respectively, out of a possible maximum score of 18). These combinations, both of which were adjuvanted with IMS 1313, gave the best protection against experimentally induced AR. Our results show that the adjuvant and the antigen composition of the vaccine strongly affect seroconversion, and that the AR-specific antibody titre does not necessarily correlate with the degree of protection. © 2008 Akadémiai Kiadó.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magyar, T., Donkó, T., & Kovács, F. (2008). Atrophic rhinitis vaccine composition triggers different serological profiles that do not correlate with protection. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 56(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1556/AVet.56.2008.1.4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free