The trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: Minimizing impacts to carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

20Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity. © 2010 by the author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gagné, S. A., & Fahrig, L. (2010). The trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: Minimizing impacts to carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03635-150412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free