Abstract
Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity. © 2010 by the author(s).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gagné, S. A., & Fahrig, L. (2010). The trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: Minimizing impacts to carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03635-150412
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.