Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AU Peer: Pleaseconfirmthatallheadinglevelsarerepresentedcorrectly review is an important part of the scientific process, but : traditional peer review at journals is coming under increased scrutiny for its inefficiency and lack of transparency. As preprints become more widely used and accepted, they raise the possibility of rethinking the peer-review process. Preprints are enabling new forms of peer review that have the potential to be more thorough, inclusive, and collegial than traditional journal peer review, and to thus fundamentally shift the culture of peer review toward constructive collaboration. In this Consensus View, we make a call to action to stakeholders in the community to accelerate the growing momentum of preprint sharing and provide recommendations to empower researchers to provide open and constructive peer review for preprints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Avissar-Whiting, M., Belliard, F., Bertozzi, S. M., Brand, A., Brown, K., Clément-Stoneham, G., … Williams, M. (2024). Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science. PLoS Biology, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002502

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free