Abstract
Using a sample drawn from a Brazilian electric company exposing employees to both dangerous and non-dangerous working conditions, the current study provides evidence on the differential underlying mechanisms guiding the relationships of organizational identification and person-organization-fit (P-O fit) with job performance. We suggest that despite their relatedness in current literature, organizational identification operates as a largely self-centered process and P-O fit as a predominantly context-dependent one, leading to distinct work-related processes deriving from each construct. Our findings suggest that P-O fit serves as a pathway through which job identification induces job performance. In this mediating path, personality and in particular neuroticism, hinders the effects of identification, whereas job dangerousness, a contextual factor, undermines work-related effects of perceived environmental congruence (P-O fit). Discussing these results, we provide novel insights on the distinct mechanisms driving organizational identification, P-O fit and their contingencies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mandalaki, E., Islam, G., Lagowska, U., & Tobace, C. (2019). Identifying with how we are, fitting with what we do: Personality and dangerousness at work as moderators of identification and person– organization fit effects. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 380–403. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1518
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.