Identifying with how we are, fitting with what we do: Personality and dangerousness at work as moderators of identification and person– organization fit effects

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using a sample drawn from a Brazilian electric company exposing employees to both dangerous and non-dangerous working conditions, the current study provides evidence on the differential underlying mechanisms guiding the relationships of organizational identification and person-organization-fit (P-O fit) with job performance. We suggest that despite their relatedness in current literature, organizational identification operates as a largely self-centered process and P-O fit as a predominantly context-dependent one, leading to distinct work-related processes deriving from each construct. Our findings suggest that P-O fit serves as a pathway through which job identification induces job performance. In this mediating path, personality and in particular neuroticism, hinders the effects of identification, whereas job dangerousness, a contextual factor, undermines work-related effects of perceived environmental congruence (P-O fit). Discussing these results, we provide novel insights on the distinct mechanisms driving organizational identification, P-O fit and their contingencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandalaki, E., Islam, G., Lagowska, U., & Tobace, C. (2019). Identifying with how we are, fitting with what we do: Personality and dangerousness at work as moderators of identification and person– organization fit effects. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 380–403. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1518

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free