Comparison of column performances in direct high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of 1- or 3-methyl-substituted tetrahydroisoquinoline analogs. Application of direct and indirect methods

12Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The enantioseparability of 1- or 3-methyl-substituted tetrahydroisoquinolines was investigated by direct and indirect high-performance liquid chromatography. α- and β-cyclodextrin-, macrocyclic glycopeptide- and cellulose-based chiral columns and isothiocyanate- and Sanger-type chiral derivatizing agents (CDAs) were applied to attain satisfactory enantioseparation. Of the chiral columns, β-cyclodextrin-, vancomycin- and teicoplanin-containing macrocyclic glycopeptide-based columns appeared to be most suitable; of the CDAs, (1S,2R)-1-acetoxy-1-phenyl-2-propyl isothiocyanate was most favorable. The differences between the selectivities of the columns and CDAs were compared and optimized to yield the best resolution. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Péter, A., Péter, M., Ilisz, I., & Fülöp, F. (2005). Comparison of column performances in direct high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of 1- or 3-methyl-substituted tetrahydroisoquinoline analogs. Application of direct and indirect methods. Biomedical Chromatography, 19(6), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.512

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free