Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular interventions in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) might offer clinical benefits compared to angiography-guided PTA in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). A cost-effectiveness model was developed to examine the benefits and costs of IVUS-guided PTA versus angiography-guided PTA in PAD patients with femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease. Methods: A two-step model (a one-year decision tree followed by a lifetime semi- Markov model) was developed from a German healthcare payer perspective to estimate the costs and outcomes over a oneyear and lifetime horizon. Clinical events included target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation, and death. Transition probabilities and utility values were derived from published literature. Healthcare costs were based on German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) codes. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. The incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: In the one-year horizon, IVUS-guided PTA resulted in incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and costs of 0.02 and €919 per patient respectively, with a corresponding ICER of €45,195/QALY gained versus angiography-guided PTA. In the lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PTA outperforms angiography-guided PTA; it was associated with a cost saving of €46 per patient and incremental QALY of 0.22. Utility value for post-TLR, as well as probabilities of death and TLR had the greatest impact on the one-year ICER, while cost of TLR and probabilities of TLR and amputation influenced the lifetime ICER most. The probability of IVUS-guided PTA being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €50,000/QALY was 50.4% in the one-year horizon and increased to 85.9% in the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: In this analysis IVUS-guided PTA among patients with symptomatic FP atherosclerosis was cost-saving in a lifetime horizon from the German healthcare payer perspective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lichtenberg, M., Mustapha, J., Tan, Y. Z., Stavroulakis, K., Meijer, C., & Bavière, H. V. (2024). Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular interventions in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. Vasa - European Journal of Vascular Medicine, 53(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free