Abstract
One of the motivations for Salmon's (1984) causal theory of explanation was the explanatory irrelevance exhibited by many arguments conforming to Hempel's covering-law models of explanation. However, the nexus of causal processes and interactions characterized by Salmon is not rich enough to supply the necessary conception of explanatory relevance. Salmon's (1994) revised theory, which is briefly criticized on independent grounds, fares no better. There is some possibility that the two-tiered structure of explanation described by Salmon (1984) may be pressed into service, but more work would have to be done. Ironically, Salmon's difficulties are similar to those suffered by his seventeenth-century predecessors.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hitchcock, C. R. (1995). Discussion: Salmon on Explanatory Relevance. Philosophy of Science, 62(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/289858
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.