Discussion: Salmon on Explanatory Relevance

  • Hitchcock C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the motivations for Salmon's (1984) causal theory of explanation was the explanatory irrelevance exhibited by many arguments conforming to Hempel's covering-law models of explanation. However, the nexus of causal processes and interactions characterized by Salmon is not rich enough to supply the necessary conception of explanatory relevance. Salmon's (1994) revised theory, which is briefly criticized on independent grounds, fares no better. There is some possibility that the two-tiered structure of explanation described by Salmon (1984) may be pressed into service, but more work would have to be done. Ironically, Salmon's difficulties are similar to those suffered by his seventeenth-century predecessors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hitchcock, C. R. (1995). Discussion: Salmon on Explanatory Relevance. Philosophy of Science, 62(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/289858

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free