Comparison of a latex agglutination assay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting cholera toxin

37Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To determine the pandemic potential of Vibrio cholerae, one must demonstrate both the presence of O1 antigen and the production of enterotoxin (CT). Tissue culture of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for CT have been limited to research and reference laboratories. A kit for detecting CT by reversed passive latex agglutination is now commercially available and was used to test 168 strains of V. cholerae O1 and non-O1. When compared with the routine ELISA, the latex test was 98% accurate (86 of 88) for serogroup O1 strains and 100% accurate (80 of 80) for non-O1 strains. For both O1 and non-O1 study strains, the sensitivity of the latex agglutination test was 0.97 and the specificity was 1.00 when results were compared with ELISA results. The latex test is commercially available and has the advantages of being less complicated and less time-consuming than the ELISA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almeida, R. J., Hickmann-Brenner, F. W., Sowers, E. G., Puhr, N. D., Farmer, J. J., & Wachsmuth, I. K. (1990). Comparison of a latex agglutination assay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting cholera toxin. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 28(1), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.28.1.128-130.1990

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free