Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs

48Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the perceptual effects of altering lexical stress during word recognition. A detection task was utilized to measure subjects' speed of response to target phonemes preceded by two-syllable homograph and nonhomograph words. These experimental words were pronounced with correct/incorrect lexical stress. When a nonhomograph was misstressed, a nonsense word was the result. When a homograph was misstressed, another English word resulted. Examination of subjects' speeds of response to target phonemes preceded by correctly/incorrectly stressed nonhomograph words indicated slower speed of response when the stimulus word was stressed incorrectly; word recognition appeared to be affected when a subject heard a misstressed nonhomograph (a nonsense word). However, subjects' speed of response to target phonemes following correctly/incorrectly stressed homographs were similar. Mispronounced homographs did not appear to impede word recognition. It was possible that when subjects heard a misstressed homograph (another English word), they relied more upon the prosodie contour for word recognition. © 1988 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Small, L. H., Simon, S. D., & Goldberg, J. S. (1988). Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free