A Neoclassical Perspective on Budget Deficits

  • Bernheim B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
194Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Generally speaking, there are three schools of thought concerning the economic effects of budget deficits: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Ricardian. It is remarkable that from among these three schools of thought, one can find support for every conceivable normative position. Whether one thinks of deficits as good, bad, or irrelevant therefore depends fundamentally on one's choice of a paradigm. Certainly, no single paradigm corresponds exactly to reality. Nevertheless, it is my view that the Neoclassical framework offers the most relevant insights into the economic effects of deficits. The new Administration would do well to focus on the goals of stimulating saving and capital accumulation, and to formulate a policy for gradually reducing permanent deficits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernheim, B. D. (1989). A Neoclassical Perspective on Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free