State coordinators of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs completed a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, or SWOT, analysis that consisted of 12 evaluative areas of EHDI programs. For the quality improvement area, a total of 218 items were listed by 47 EHDI coordinators, and themes were identified in each category. A threats, opportunities, weaknesses, and strengths, or TOWS, analysis matrix yielded 12 recommendations that focused on similar themes. Out of these 12 recommendations, 3 strategies emerged: 1) upgrade data management systems that will generate automated reports based on the state benchmarks coordinators wish to measure; 2) quality monitoring should be integrated into the state system at all levels and not as a separate job; and 3) all quality measures should be publically posted to hold the EHDI system accountable. Addressed appropriately, these recommendations can strengthen quality improvement in state EHDI programs.
CITATION STYLE
Bradham, T. S., Hoffman, J., Todd Houston, K., & Guignard, G. H. (2011). Fostering quality improvement in EHDI programs. Volta Review, 111(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.17955/tvr.111.2.m.667
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.