Systematic spatial bias in DNA microarray hybridization is caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion

16Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The hybridization of nucleic acid targets with surface-immobilized probes is a widely used assay for the parallel detection of multiple targets in medical and biological research. Despite its widespread application, DNA microarray technology still suffers from several biases and lack of reproducibility, stemming in part from an incomplete understanding of the processes governing surface hybridization. In particular, non-random spatial variations within individual microarray hybridizations are often observed, but the mechanisms underpinning this positional bias remain incompletely explained. Methodology/Principal Findings: This study identifies and rationalizes a systematic spatial bias in the intensity of surface hybridization, characterized by markedly increased signal intensity of spots located at the boundaries of the spotted areas of the microarray slide. Combining observations from a simplified single-probe block array format with predictions from a mathematical model, the mechanism responsible for this bias is found to be a position-dependent variation in lateral diffusion of target molecules. Numerical simulations reveal a strong influence of microarray well geometry on the spatial bias. Conclusions: Reciprocal adjustment of the size of the microarray hybridization chamber to the area of surface-bound probes is a simple and effective measure to minimize or eliminate the diffusion-based bias, resulting in increased uniformity and accuracy of quantitative DNA microarray hybridization. © 2011 Steger et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steger, D., Berry, D., Haider, S., Horn, M., Wagner, M., Stocker, R., & Loy, A. (2011). Systematic spatial bias in DNA microarray hybridization is caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion. PLoS ONE, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023727

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free