Otoacoustic emission suppression in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder and speech in noise perception deficits

10Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that medial olivocochlear system functionality is associated with speech recognition in babble performance in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder. Method: Children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder who specifically demonstrated speech in noise deficits were compared to children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder without these deficits. Suppression effects were examined across 15 time intervals to examine variability. Analysis of right and left ear suppression was performed separately to evaluate laterality. Study sample: 52 children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder, aged 6–14 years were divided into normal or abnormal groups based on SinB performance in each ear. Cut-off value was set at SNR = 1.33 dB. Transient otoacoustic emissions suppression was measured. Results: The abnormal Speech in Babble Right Ear group showed significant negative correlations with suppression levels for 7 of the 15 time intervals measured. No significant correlations with SinBR performance were observed for the remaining time intervals, as was the case for the typically evaluated R8-18 time interval and the Speech in Babble Left Ear. Conclusions: Results indicate that suppression is influenced by the time window analysed, and ear tested, and is associated with speech recognition in babble performance in children with central auditory processing disorder.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iliadou, V. (Vivian), Weihing, J., Chermak, G. D., & Bamiou, D. E. (2018). Otoacoustic emission suppression in children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder and speech in noise perception deficits. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 111, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free